Re: [Talk-us] Addresses and Tiger

2009-05-30 Thread Paul Johnson
Russ Nelson wrote: > On May 30, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Dale Puch wrote: > >> Can/should this be done with relations instead of separate paths? The >> idea is to have it stick to the road. With this it creates a lot more >> nodes, and there is no easy way to manually get the spacing right >> between t

Re: [Talk-us] Addresses and Tiger

2009-05-30 Thread Russ Nelson
On May 30, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Dale Puch wrote: > Can/should this be done with relations instead of separate paths? The > idea is to have it stick to the road. With this it creates a lot more > nodes, and there is no easy way to manually get the spacing right > between the road and the addresses

Re: [Talk-us] Addresses and Tiger

2009-05-30 Thread Paul Johnson
Theodore Book wrote: > I have worked the Tiger shapefile converter into a state where I think > the Karlsruhe lines are ready for import into OSM. (The highway lines > probably need some more attention first.) I am uploading the Karlsruhe > ways for Rockdale Co. GA, (Link below) a place where

Re: [Talk-us] Addresses and Tiger

2009-05-30 Thread Dale Puch
Can/should this be done with relations instead of separate paths? The idea is to have it stick to the road. With this it creates a lot more nodes, and there is no easy way to manually get the spacing right between the road and the addresses if something is moved. Also the spacing needed is rende