Re: [Talk-us] Tag convention for bulk imports?

2009-07-13 Thread Adam Schreiber
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Tyler wrote: > So then if we're going to use admin levels there should be a boundary type > since administrative clearly doesn't work. But then we're back to the > previous discussion about creating a new tagging scheme for parks and > reserves. At that point you ca

Re: [Talk-us] Tag convention for bulk imports?

2009-07-13 Thread Tyler
> > You might want to use the admin_level tag for specifying the municipal > level. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level#admin_level That seems to be a favored suggestion re: parks. But there's no current tagging scheme which is appropriate. What admin level would a national par

Re: [Talk-us] Tag convention for bulk imports?

2009-07-13 Thread Adam Schreiber
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Tyler wrote: >>   If it is necessary to further classify parks in the US, one logical tag >> scheme might be >> >>  park=city >>  park=county >>  park=state >>  park=national > > I think better would be leisure=outdoor_recreation (or something similar) > because we