On 10/12/09 10:28 AM, Bill Ricker wrote:
I sympathize with Greg, and if the surveyors and computational mappers
ruled the world, the real world we seek to model will be simpler.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:44 PM, David Lynchdjly...@gmail.com wrote:
where city limits cross county lines,
WTF?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Andrew Sawyer assaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for taking a look. On the Information Freeway site it still shows a
rendering issue. I notice that the Mapnik layer was getting changes faster.
I tried manually forcing a rerender via the site, but nothing
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Seth Fitzsimmons s...@mojodna.net wrote:
That looks likely. Quabbin Reservoir (Western MA) is also rendering
similarly:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.3749lon=-72.2847zoom=12layers=0B00FTF
Last I checked, landuse=reservoir is being rendered like
Why is it, when I receive messages from this list, they don't come
with a reply-to header so replies automatically go back to the list
and not individual sender(s)? That would be helpful. The newbies
list has such headers. I looked on the list subscription site and I
didn't see any settings
try, replying ALL, cc's the talk-us list.
There is a setting to make it so that you dont get this message twice, for
example.
Cheers,
Sam
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:06 AM, David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.comwrote:
Why is it, when I receive messages from this list, they don't come
with a
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:31 AM, David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
You're still acting like the tags are put on regions, when the tags
are actually put on borders.
It's both. The relation (specifically, boundary and
Dave - super awesome.
As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
people import them one by one will be the best way to do it.
Another random thought - should the addressing ways be one long way
with
On 13 Oct 2009, at 09:26, Simone Cortesi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:20, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
people import them one by one will be the
On 13 Oct 2009, at 9:20 , SteveC wrote:
Dave - super awesome.
As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
people import them one by one will be the best way to do it.
yes this is the best way to get
9 matches
Mail list logo
