On 20 April 2010 05:24, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>> Sounds a lot like the IMO ill-considered road name expansion that was
>> apparently agreed upon by a small group of people without input from the
>> majority of active mappers whose work has been damaged.
>
> agreed, no idea why this was done.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 20 April 2010 05:24, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> >> Sounds a lot like the IMO ill-considered road name expansion that was
> >> apparently agreed upon by a small group of people without input from the
> >> majority of active mappers
On 22 April 2010 01:18, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski
> wrote:
>> Where's damage in that -- is it in that you can now read the name out
>> without checking the documentation for what that funny string means in
>> that particular database that is
At 2010-04-21 17:12, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
>On 22 April 2010 01:18, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:36 PM, andrzej zaborowski
> > wrote:
> >> Where's damage in that -- is it in that you can now read the name out
> >> without checking the documentation for what that fu
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 19:24, Alan Mintz wrote:
> Exactly! Sounds like it's only useful purpose is text-2-speech. Here's what
> I'd like to see:
>
> name: The pre-balrog name
> name_direction_prefix: The 1-2 char cardinal direction before the root
> use_name_direction_prefix: {yes|no} Yes indicat
First of all, I've renamed the subject to what it is really discussing.
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 19:24 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:
> name: The pre-balrog name
> name_direction_prefix: The 1-2 char cardinal direction before the root
> use_name_direction_prefix: {yes|no} Yes indicates that the
> name_dir
6 matches
Mail list logo
