A friend of mine found a flickr set from MODOT with more aerial
imagery (not rectified but high resolution)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/26387...@n06/sets/72157621103069705
This makes it obvious that there is indeed a direct link over to
Norton and that it is open as you can see cars driving on i
Hi everyone,
At the Google Summer of Code mentors summit this past weekend Google asked
us (the organizations that participated in Summer of Code) to also
participate in the Google Code-In project. The Code-In project is similar to
the Summer of Code but for 13-18 year olds. The tasks are meant to
On 10/28/2010 03:27 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> I recently stumbled upon an article[1] about the new use of the divided
> diamond interchange design in the US.
>
> It seems that the first one[2] is here[3] in Missouri and as yet unmapped.
>
> A second one in the same city is here[4], and it appears t
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:13 PM, j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:54 PM, j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
>>> I've taken care of the new interchange at I-44 & N Kansas Expressway
>> Are you sure there's no direct ramp from I-44
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:54 PM, j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
> I've taken care of the new interchange at I-44 & N Kansas Expressway
Are you sure there's no direct ramp from I-44 west to Norton Road like
the plans show? You might also want to include the center sidewalk, as
it's a rather strange configu
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mike N. wrote:
>
>> Aerial photos on Google and Yahoo are both out of date, so I can’t map
>> them myself.
>>
>> Is anyone in that area and able to update these interchanges?
>
> Interesting - the NAIP imagery includes this, so I'll try to get it later
> tonight i
Aerial photos on Google and Yahoo are both out of date, so I can’t map
them myself.
Is anyone in that area and able to update these interchanges?
Interesting - the NAIP imagery includes this, so I'll try to get it later
tonight if no one else has updated it by then.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> I recently stumbled upon an article[1] about the new use of the divided
> diamond interchange design in the US.
>
> It seems that the first one[2] is here[3] in Missouri and as yet unmapped.
>
> A second one in the same city is here[4], and it a
I recently stumbled upon an article[1] about the new use of the divided
diamond interchange design in the US.
It seems that the first one[2] is here[3] in Missouri and as yet unmapped.
A second one in the same city is here[4], and it appears that the old
interchange hasn’t been mapped either.
Hi,
Peter Budny wrote:
1) The common way, up to now, for storing routes that alternate between
single- and dual-carriageway has been to leave the single-carriageway
parts without a role, or with the role "north/south". This makes the
order of the members of the relation meaningless, since you
On 28 Oct 2010, at 7:51 , Peter Budny wrote:
>
> To me, this says we really ought to be using super-relations for route
> relations, rather than a single relation with roles tagged, for 2
> reasons:
>
yes, absolutely, the relation with role is very limited, one more reason is the
checking tool
(sorry for the crossposting, but this really applies globally, as well
as for recent discussions on the talk-us list)
Ian Dees writes:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Peter Budny wrote:
>
> Jochen Topf writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:39:38AM +0200, Frank Broniewski wrot
12 matches
Mail list logo
