On 01/02/2011 10:08 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
>
>> Eh, OK-66 and Old US-66 and USBR-66 are all in my neighborhood. Also,
>> does this work cleanly with relations?
>
> Seems to work fine with either relations or ways. Do you have some
> t
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Eh, OK-66 and Old US-66 and USBR-66 are all in my neighborhood. Also,
> does this work cleanly with relations?
Seems to work fine with either relations or ways. Do you have some
test cases in mind? I'm not sure what you are looking for as
On 01/01/2011 11:55 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> I've been adding more highway shields to the shield renderer. Most
> recently I've added a shield for Historic Route 66.
>
> http://weait.com:8080/map/shield.html?lat=40.36679&lon=-89.10653&zoom=16&layers=BTF
>
> Now, be honest. Is the Route 66 son
On 01/01/2011 09:45 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Richard Weait
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Nathan Edgars II
>> wrote:
>>> Question: what do people think about minimum standards for tagging
>>> something highway=motorway? In other words, would it
On 01/01/2011 04:47 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Question: what do people think about minimum standards for tagging
> something highway=motorway? In other words, would it be reasonable to
> tag a highway as trunk rather than motorway because it has no
> shoulders or a low speed limit (40 mph)?
My
Richard,
Hooray! What a great New Year gift. I'll add it in Arizona,
since I've been on almost every inch of ther original.
Now, how about a shield for the Lincoln Highway? It's more
complex because there were multiple generations, often on different
ways, but it's an importan
* Richard Welty [2011-01-01 13:15 -0500]:
> can someone point me at examples of well formed County Boundary
> relations in the US?
I'd like to think the boundaries in Maryland are pretty good:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maryland/Administrative_Boundaries
They're all multipolygons and
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
> if by 2 lane freeway, you mean a "super 2", by convention those are
> usually trunk in the US.
I mean what some roadgeeks call a "super 2", which isn't necessarily
the same as what others use that term for. Two-lane freeway is a more
precise
On 1/2/11 11:18 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Mike N. wrote:
3. The 'Chickasaw Turnpike' toll road OSM classification is a question
mark - I left it as secondary because it is not grade-separated carriageway,
but I believe it qualifies as trunk. Any other ro
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Mike N. wrote:
> 3. The 'Chickasaw Turnpike' toll road OSM classification is a question
> mark - I left it as secondary because it is not grade-separated carriageway,
> but I believe it qualifies as trunk. Any other road reclassifications for
> this area?
It'
This might get me strung up on the yardarm, but I propose
1.) Mapping in a place I've never been to
2.) Doing an import for a single county from the county's GIS data
Background: Murray County's (Oklahoma) roads were recently renamed for E911
purposes. This data is as-of 11/29/2010 - newer
11 matches
Mail list logo
