Even before April Fools:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511
I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.562lon=-112.387zoom=11layers=M
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.812lon=-101.089zoom=11layers=M
Add I-15 to that list as well as not being in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.3441lon=-111.9452zoom=13layers=M
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
On 03/11/2012 10:58 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Even before April Fools:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511
I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.562lon=-112.387zoom=11layers=M
Frederik, can we get these reverted? I'd do it myself but I'm not confident
enough with the revert tools and I doubt this changeset will revert cleanly.
In the particular example of way 44925685, a quick look shows no tags that
could not be recovered with TIGER and odbl=clean.
As an aside,
On 3/11/2012 6:35 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/11/2012 10:58 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Even before April Fools:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511
I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada.
I'd like to solicit some thoughts on the tagging for special routes
(commonly known as bannered routes)[0]. In route relations, it's
customary to separate the network and the reference number. How do or
should special routes fit into that?
I'm torn between three views and I'm not sure which of
I'm making print versions of OSM coverage in US counties:
http://mike.teczno.com/notes/county-papers.html
What additional data, whether OSM or Census or otherwise, should be on there?
-mike.
michal migurski-
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com wrote:
I'm making print versions of OSM coverage in US counties:
http://mike.teczno.com/notes/county-papers.html
What additional data, whether OSM or Census or otherwise, should be on
there?
- Public spaces (parks,
On Mar 11, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com wrote:
I'm making print versions of OSM coverage in US counties:
http://mike.teczno.com/notes/county-papers.html
What additional data, whether OSM or Census or otherwise,
Can someone please revert changeset 10842511? It's too big for JOSM's
reverter plugin.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Yesterday I did a serious bit of remapping from TIGER 2011 data in the
LA area. I wanted to see what the process would be like and how much I
could get done in a reasonable amount of time. I just wrote up a quick
blog post about it and would welcome any comments on the subject.
On 3/11/2012 6:48 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
I just wrote up a quick
blog post about it and would welcome any comments on the subject.
Last year I did all the new subdivisions in my whole county using
TIGER 2010 against the original import. There were approximately 120
new subdivisions to
I looked at the .CA lists and couldn't tell if this was due to removing
data that isn't even CC-SA compliant, or making it easier to get a jump
start on remapping. If the purpose is to make remapping easier, I
think it is disrespectful of data consumers. Data consumers are aware
of the 1
On Mar 11, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Mike N wrote:
I looked at the .CA lists and couldn't tell if this was due to removing data
that isn't even CC-SA compliant, or making it easier to get a jump start on
remapping. If the purpose is to make remapping easier, I think it is
disrespectful of data
On 3/11/12 11:16 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
I'm partial to the idea of separating the banner from the reference
number, but I'm not sure how any of these ideas mesh with the
understandings of people with more experience with road networks than I
have.
i like the idea of separating banners out too,
* Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net [2012-03-11 20:59 -0400]:
On 3/11/12 11:16 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
I'm partial to the idea of separating the banner from the reference
number, but I'm not sure how any of these ideas mesh with the
understandings of people with more experience with road
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 3/11/2012 6:48 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
I just wrote up a quick
blog post about it and would welcome any comments on the subject.
Great, thanks for sharing! I've added a link to the wiki:
It's obvious to me that the banner is not part of the network. US 1
Alternate is part of the U.S. Highway system (US:US), not some mythical
U.S. Highway Alternate system.
It also makes the most sense to put it in the ref tag. Otherwise there's
inconsistency between an alternate signed as US 1
On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/11/2012 08:37 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
These are the sorts of things that counties tend to already have
data for. They'll either be impressed with how great OSM is or
they'll show off their data and we can get them to give it to
19 matches
Mail list logo
