Wasn't someone working on importing address data from TIGER? I was under
the impression that may have depended on tiger:tlid tags on objects already
in OSM, but wasn't sure…
On Jul 30, 2012 1:50 AM, Alan grunthos...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 16:21 -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
On 7/30/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On 07/29/2012 11:56 PM, Skye Book wrote:
Do we have a source for NYC administrative boundaries?
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/districtsmetadata.shtml
there also should be boundaries in TIGER. most of the problems i've seen
with nominatim and
On 7/30/2012 7:18 AM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
Wasn't someone working on importing address data from TIGER? I was under
the impression that may have depended on tiger:tlid tags on objects
already in OSM, but wasn't sure…
TIGER address data isn't nearly accurate enough to import into OSM.
* Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net [2012-07-29 18:54 -0700]:
[1] When combining ways in JOSM (at least), values for tiger:* tags
are combined with : (colon) as a delimiter, instead of ;
(semi-colon). Why, and should this be changed?
I believe this behavior was intended to make
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
On 07/29/2012 11:56 PM, Skye Book wrote:
Do we have a source for NYC administrative boundaries?
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/districtsmetadata.shtml
I'm not sure of the license situation with any of the
10, Park Plaza, Central Square, Bay Village, Middlesex, Massachusetts,
02116, United States of America.
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=21777524
The Central Square, Bay Village and Middlesex are what are
confusing me as they look to be points and I'm not sure
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
So I'm somewhat confused about how nominatim actually works. A good example
is the building I work in (10 park plaza Boston ma) the version of nominitum
on the website gets the correct location on the
Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us writes:
So basically if we see nodes like that, get rid of them?
No, I think it's:
If there's a node for the place, it's progress to replace it with a
polygon.
Not
Just delete place nodes
pgpaHaOu9jRqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
*constructively get rid of them
For places that already have boundary relations (like Middlesex county) what is
the best method to do that
-Original Message-
From: Greg Troxel [mailto:g...@ir.bbn.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 2:57 PM
To: Metcalf, Calvin
Cc: 'Serge Wroclawski';
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us writes:
So basically if we see nodes like that, get rid of them?
No, I think it's:
If there's a node for the place, it's progress to replace it with a
polygon.
So I transferred the attributes from the middlesex node to the relation and
deleted the node, lets see how this works.
If I was to complain about one thing nominatim related it would be the
documentation. While I was able to find some pretty detailed info for
installing it, but less about how
great idea, have done it manually from time to time when I edit tiger data.
just adding my support after reading pro/con for certain tags. Ideally you
can come up with a default list and users can extend it.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people
For those who may not have seen this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/28/business/28map.html?_r=3
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
13 matches
Mail list logo
