On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Chris Lawrence lordsu...@gmail.comwrote:
I think there is still some misunderstanding.
One of the transforms is:
1704295,road,US:TX:Spur,601,,US:TX,601,Spur,happy5214,5
Spur in Texas is not a modifier; it's a distinct type of route that is
numbered
Paul Johnson wrote:
FM and RM are the same network...seems odd for them to show up twice
here...
I could've sworn that the general consensus from a previous argument was
one network per shield type.
Alexander
___
Talk-us mailing list
On Oct 22, 2012 9:57 AM, Alexander Jones happy5...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
FM and RM are the same network...seems odd for them to show up twice
here...
I could've sworn that the general consensus from a previous argument was
one network per shield type.
They use the same
On Oct 22, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Oct 22, 2012 9:57 AM, Alexander Jones happy5...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
FM and RM are the same network...seems odd for them to show up twice
here...
I could've sworn that the general consensus from a previous
I do hope to come to an agreement within OSM along the lines you just hashed
out, Frederik (while not quite advocating for it):
The data extracted by geocoding should just not lead to a substantial extract
of the database, hence not producing a derivative database in the sense of the
ODbL. I
On Oct 22, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
The data extracted by geocoding should just not lead to a substantial extract
of the database, hence not producing a derivative database in the sense of
the ODbL. I feel this would be within the spirit of why the ODbL was adopted
(to encourage
The newly elected US Chapter board will have its first official
meeting tonight at 5PM PDT / 8PM EDT. We're going to try a Google
Hangout. Everyone is welcome to listen in!
https://plus.google.com/events/c91rctgp4ia8cq3ffqo914lvvus
--
martijn van exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Alexander Jones
happy5...@gmail.comwrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Oct 22, 2012 9:57 AM, Alexander Jones
happy5...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
FM and RM are the same network...seems odd for
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
Did they switch from one term to the other at some point? If so, the mix
of signs on the same route might be because some of the signs have been
replaced as they rusted out and/or got used for target practice.
Not
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
Hi,
On 22.10.2012 22:12, Alex Barth wrote:
I do hope to come to an agreement within OSM along the lines you just
hashed out, Frederik (while not quite advocating for it):
This really ought to be discussed on legal-talk where there are many
people with a year-long involvement into the finer
Thanks for kicking over to legal list. Responses inline.
On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 22.10.2012 22:12, Alex Barth wrote:
I do hope to come to an agreement within OSM along the lines you just
hashed out, Frederik (while not quite advocating
William Morris writes:
Third local mapper chimes in: As weird as the cartography will look (and
I've seen it appear as such on OSM in other U.S. cities), Route 7 through
Burlington has no business being listed as primary. I can hit a maximum of
25mph on the sections between stop signs, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
