Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations

2012-10-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote: > You can check the highway designation file for the correct designation > of specific routes. If something else is on the sign, the local > district probably screwed up (several TxDOT district offices aren't > exactly known for their scrupu

Re: [Talk-us] US chapter board meeting

2012-10-24 Thread the Old Topo Depot
Hi Greg, Thanks for sharing your concerns re Google Hangout. We've had similar comments from others and having discussions about what we can do to help address such concerns. Having said that, I will also say that the ability to see, as well as hear, the other folks on the call (even though they

Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations (attn: Richard Welty, etc.)

2012-10-24 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Michal Migurski wrote: > I applied these changes to OSM last night, in a series of five changesets: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13611326 > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13612265 > http://www.openstreetm

Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations

2012-10-24 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > They use the same shield, and even TXDOT signs Farm Road and Ranch Road > interchangeably. They're definitely the same network. While they use the same numbering sequence (as do State Highway Spurs and State Highway Loops), they are definit

Re: [Talk-us] US chapter board meeting

2012-10-24 Thread Greg Troxel
Martijn van Exel writes: > The newly elected US Chapter board will have its first official > meeting tonight at 5PM PDT / 8PM EDT. We're going to try a Google > Hangout. Everyone is welcome to listen in! > > https://plus.google.com/events/c91rctgp4ia8cq3ffqo914lvvus (I'm not a member, and I'm n

Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations (attn: Richard Weait, etc.)

2012-10-24 Thread Michal Migurski
(Changing subject line to the Richard I originally meant) That was my understanding as well, but I got feedback that boiled down to "don't mess with the network tags (too much)". What do others think about this? -mike. On Oct 24, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Dale Puch wrote: > That is my understanding a

Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations (attn: Richard Welty, etc.)

2012-10-24 Thread Dale Puch
That is my understanding as well based on previous discussions. For For US Business route 80: network = US:US:Business ref = 80 On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Alexander Jones wrote: > Using your example, the network tag should say "US:US:Business" > > Alexander > > Michal Migurski wrote: > > >

Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations (attn: Richard Welty, etc.)

2012-10-24 Thread Alexander Jones
Using your example, the network tag should say "US:US:Business" Alexander Michal Migurski wrote: > On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Michal Migurski wrote: > >> On Oct 21, 2012, at 8:54 PM, Michal Migurski wrote: >> >>> I feel like this scrubbing process has revealed so much about the >>> intricaci

Re: [Talk-us] Scrubbing route relations (attn: Richard Welty, etc.)

2012-10-24 Thread Michal Migurski
On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Michal Migurski wrote: > On Oct 21, 2012, at 8:54 PM, Michal Migurski wrote: > >> I feel like this scrubbing process has revealed so much about the >> intricacies of different road networks that I'm going to take a slightly >> different approach, and focus my work o