On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
Am 15/dic/2012 um 22:39 schrieb Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
3. **What tagging are you proposing?
addr:* and landuse
the only additional tag are the four detailed landuse tags
eg
Hi,
The following towns were imported this weekend that were previously mostly
devoid of structures.
Abington, Acton, Acushnet, Alford, Arlington, Ashfield, Auburn, Avon,
Dunstable, Harwich, Leyden, Littleton, Mattapoisett, Millville, Mount
Washington, Nahant, Newburyport, Truro, and
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Jason Remillard
remillard.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I update the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MassGIS_Buildings_Import
Jason,
While I think it's great you want to help OSM in this way, I have a
few concerns.
I think it's great that you've
Hi,
The script has been getting move around a bit as switched over to
having all of the OSM files in one zip file. I put the script in the
google docs directory, outside of the big zip.
Thanks
Jason.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13,
I pulled together some of the notes and imagery I've been posting here recently:
http://www.openstreetmap.us/~migurski/green-means-go/
It's a map of 1km×1km squares covering the continental United States. Green
squares show places where data imports are unlikely to interfere with
OK this is plain awesome. Great work Mike.
One note of caution though - the title may suggest that you can just
go ahead and import away, but folks would still have to follow the
import guidelines and contact the OSM community at large, come up with
a solid proposal and discuss that, even if
As mentioned previously on talk-us, I made contact with the Riley
county GIS department and got access to their data. Since then I have
been analyzing and working with the data. I believe I am nearing a
point at which I can proceed with some imports based on this data.
There are a few different
7 matches
Mail list logo
