Hi Greg,
I think in all the back and forth you missed the fact that the gnis
feature id is staying put. Nobody has suggested removing it. Looking
at the node history it will be obvious if a feature was imported
(which is why we have the history function). The rest of the tags are
going because the
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've been looking at the GNIS data and it's quite a mess.
>>>
>>
>>
>> This is a horribly crafted prop
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been looking at the GNIS data and it's quite a mess.
>>
>
>
> This is a horribly crafted proposal. You haven't shown your research why
> but you declare the
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been looking at the GNIS data and it's quite a mess.
>
This is a horribly crafted proposal. You haven't shown your research why
but you declare the GNIS tags as a mess. Your proposal is as good as me
declaring that a
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@ l
5 matches
Mail list logo