[Talk-us] Oklahoma relations spreadsheet

I'm working on an Oklahoma route relation spreadsheetto get a better grip on working status of route relations in Oklahoma. Please let me know if you want edit access on it (ie, you're actively ma

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Peter Davies wrote: > Paul, > > One of the things that Martijn and I agree needs to be possible is for > routes to change directional posting part-way along. This commonly happens > on beltways like that around Minneapolis St-Paul, that around Indie, and on > AZ Lo

[Talk-us] Relation member order/structure; best effort worth it?

A sidelong topic to "separate relations." Volker and I just shared some email about how he uses JOSM automation to order relation elements, whereas I make some effort to "smarten them up." This includes getting more, rather than fewer "route is ordered" messages from JOSM's relation editor's

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

Martijn, When you're dealing with a repeatedly mixed single/dual carriageway road, such as CA 78, the lack of a diagram in JOSM showing single/dual logic once you switch from role=forward to role=east (or west) soon becomes unbearable. In the end I gave up and created separate EB and WB relation

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

Paul, One of the things that Martijn and I agree needs to be possible is for routes to change directional posting part-way along. This commonly happens on beltways like that around Minneapolis St-Paul, that around Indie, and on AZ Loop 101 and 202 here in Metro Phoenix. For my part, I also feel w

[Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

> > > The main thing I haven't looked into yet is the validation checks. Who > knows which validation checks are run on relations in JOSM and/or iD > to ensure 'unbroken-ness' and perhaps other things? > The only tool I know to do this in a useful way is the OSM Relation Analyzer http://ra.osmsur

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

I'm curious how this proposal works with roads like the northern section of the Muskogee Turnpike, which officially runs "North" towards Tulsa, and "East" towards Muskogee, the road's two terminii. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Chris