Hi,
Would it be possible for somebody from telenav/scout/skobbler to
update this page, or make a new wiki page describing what tagging is
actually used to determine if a way is considered for a route?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing
Playing around with scout, I have
Stava is also routing with OSM. I CC'd Paul Mach who spoke about their cool
Slide tool for mapping paths at SOTMUS 14. I'm wondering if the strava
routing considers said tags.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible for
Il giorno 01/lug/2014, alle ore 20:15, Jason Remillard
remillard.ja...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Similarly to how default tile server shapes tagging, scout, skobbler ,
osmand, etc, and the other widely used OSM routing applications will
inevitably shape tagging. It would be useful to
Hi Martin,
Some of the highway tag values are not clear. For example, scout does
not route over highway=tracks, unless you are in pedestrian mode. It
seems like a reasonable decision, perhaps all of the routers do this,
but the wiki documentation says nothing of the sort, and it surprised
me. If
Il giorno 01/lug/2014, alle ore 23:15, Jason Remillard
remillard.ja...@gmail.com ha scritto:
For example, scout does
not route over highway=tracks, unless you are in pedestrian mode. It
seems like a reasonable decision, perhaps all of the routers do this,
no, some routers do use tracks
see attached notice of scheduled maintenance.
Thank you, sysadmins, for your endless efforts on our behalf.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com
Date: Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:22 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] NOTICE: Upcoming Maintenance - Some services
Hi Jason,
I hadn't seen that page for a while, thank you for reminding me. I
don't really trust that page to be reliable, because it does not
contain any concrete references to applications / services actually
adhering to these conventions.
With that said I agree fully that having a resource
I don't know how this keeps happening, but I responded with my osm.us
account again. I sincerely apologize. Of course, I am not speaking as
the board president on matters like these.
Martijn
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Martijn van Exel
mart...@openstreetmap.us wrote:
Hi Jason,
I hadn't
Added a comment to the discussion section of that page as well:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:OSM_tags_for_routing#Authority.3F
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I don't know how this keeps happening, but I responded with my osm.us
account again.
On 7/1/2014 7:18 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
With that said I agree fully that having a resource that*is*
trustworthy (containing references to which router supports certain
conventions) is becoming increasingly important
I would also find this very helpful - not to tag for a particular
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
11 matches
Mail list logo
