On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:30:37PM +, Harald Kliems wrote:
I think I figured it out. It's the no-U-turn relations (4286903 and
4286904). Instead of having the same way as from and to, they reference
a segment further down the road as their to. Probably that was caused by
someone splitting
Hi Eric:
happy to fix if you can tell me where to put the no-U-turn restrictions.
I'm seeing nine or so of them just for that intersection, which makes me
wonder if all of them are necessary anyway -- are they actually signed,
especially the ones at the two turn lanes?
Harald.
On Sat Jan 31 2015
2 matches
Mail list logo