[Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

I've been normally mapping slip lanes as '_link' highways at intersections since the beginning. However, as most fellow US mappers know, they almost never have 'speed limits' posted for them, and that seems to help cause problems in some routing programs when they give those slip lanes a speed

Re: [Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

In reality there is only one set of stop lights there, correct? In other words, if one were headed south on McKnight Road turning east on Seibert, one would not have to stop (assuming red lights) three different times. 1) A routing engine should have some heuristics to interpret the three (in

Re: [Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

2) There should be some cost in a routing engine for making a u-turn so as to discourage such routes even if there was an extra set of signals. Making a u-turn does take time (one can not go from the posted speed limit in one direction to the posted speed limit in the other direction

Re: [Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:58 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: I've been normally mapping slip lanes as '_link' highways at intersections since the beginning. However, as most fellow US mappers know, they almost never have 'speed limits' posted for them, and that seems to help

Re: [Talk-us] Am I mapping this wrong, or should the router be fixed for this?

] - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/osmand/XJ-HVOHhKEM [3] - https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/1501                         -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150727/8a715b2f