* Kevin Kenny [160411 02:22]:
> [..]
> Will the same idea work with waterways? There are a lot of places near
> me where there's a collective name: "Preston Ponds", "Essex Chain of
> Lakes" ... with individual waterbodies having the unimaginative names
> "Upper Pond," "Middle Pond," "Lower Po
On 04/10/2016 12:24 PM, Elliott Plack wrote:
Agreed! I think we should do a super relation too, also because with
all of the parts spread over a large linear area, the label only
appears in the middle, and thus is often not shown in the popular
southern area.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:40 PM st
Agreed! I think we should do a super relation too, also because with all of
the parts spread over a large linear area, the label only appears in the
middle, and thus is often not shown in the popular southern area.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:40 PM stevea wrote:
> > The
> >individual areas are gen
3 matches
Mail list logo