[Talk-us] New MeetUp OSM group in Los Angeles

Hello, I'm trying to get an OSM group up and running in Los Angeles. The former Southern California group, formerly operated by ESRI, was going to shut down, but I thought I would see if I can get it going. There are many exciting projects we could do, in addition to learning

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

What about just combining the relations for selected states where the AT crosses back and forth across the state border, like TN/NC and VA/WV? On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > > On May 2, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Mike N wrote: > > > > On

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

> On May 2, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Mike N wrote: > > On 5/2/2016 11:41 AM, Elliott Plack wrote: >> This got me thinking, is there any specific need to have the route >> broken up by state? Unlike interstate highways, where maintenance >> changes across state lines, at the border,

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

On 5/2/2016 11:41 AM, Elliott Plack wrote: This got me thinking, is there any specific need to have the route broken up by state? Unlike interstate highways, where maintenance changes across state lines, at the border, the AT maintenance is handled by a trifecta of federal agencies and a

[Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

I've been doing some mapping along the Maryland portions of the Appalachian Trail lately and noticed many issues along Maryland's section as well as nearby Virginia and West Virginia where the route relations were not continuous or overlapped other states'. Strava's slide has been quite helpful in

Re: [Talk-us] Is USBR 11 in Maryland complete/correct in OSM?

Just to echo Steve’s comment on signs: encouraged but not required. Currently just under 18% of the USBRS is signed. Budget is the issue, both at the state and local (non state highway) level. Kerry From: OSM Volunteer stevea [mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com] Sent: Sunday, May 1,

Re: [Talk-us] Colorado mappers: Check your notes carefully

SteveA wrote: > [Great Divide Mountain Bike Route] > where MountainAddict keeps setting this to network=ncn > when clearly it is network=icn (as it crosses the Canadian > border in Alberta). A partial compromise/consensus > solution has emerged: keep a duplicate relation synced as >