Re: [Talk-us] Choptank River

Thanks for the inspiration Simon. I spent some time today in JOSM improving the accuracy of the Choptank. Here's the finished relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/132#map=11/38.7592/-76.0542 Notes 1. Previous editors had created about 10 relations that were adjacent. I removed all

Re: [Talk-us] I think I got this right...

On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Paul Johnson wrote > It would be easier to verify by using forward in the child relations > exclusively.  Then it will validate as a loop, or it won't, > and the gap becomes immediately apparent.  As tagged, most tools (JOSM > included) won't "get" it.

Re: [Talk-us] I think I got this right...

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:11 PM, wrote: > Regarding the use of child relations for routes, and what to do about > directional roles on beltways, I made some mapping changes to a beltway > that happens to be local to me. > > > > I took the relation for I-435[1] and