Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details > > A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county > information. I've eliminated all objects that have been reported to be > ok, and plan to

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

I wrote "NSW and Queensland don't have any sources of names that we can use, so they will have to be surveyed." Actually , I meant Victoria and Queensland. NSW does have a good source but there are no redacted roads in NSW. ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Thanks for fixing the Tucson and Pima County ones. My family still owns a house north of Tucson so that is one of the areas I look at from time to time. I just fixed the couple that were by Yuma. Looks like most of the remaining ones are in Maricopa County. . . > On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:21 PM,

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

AZ has none because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51502902 rather than an actual absence of things to fix from this (that changeset essentially pre-redacted the names, so they no longor appear in Frederick's list of redactions). I've fixed those I could find in the Tucson & Pima

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Yeah, I'm about done with Michigan (40 ways to check). I just used the OpenData plugin for JOSM to open a filtered csv, which made it clear there were a few clusters. I downloaded the data for each cluster and used a search "type:way user:woodpeck_repair" to add the ways to the todolist plugin.