On 11/29/17 10:36 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote:
> These unsigned reference route numbers probably should use the
> unsigned_ref=* tag. Seems like the best compromise.
that's what i intend to do if i need to go in and clean this up.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS &
These unsigned reference route numbers probably should use the
unsigned_ref=* tag. Seems like the best compromise.
-Evin (compdude)
On Nov 29, 2017 6:24 PM, "Richard Welty" wrote:
> i have spotted what appears to be an armchair mapper making an
> inappropriate
> set of edits to some NYS routes
i have spotted what appears to be an armchair mapper making an inappropriate
set of edits to some NYS routes this past summer; i have sent the mapper
a note
through the OSM message system but thought this could use a broader
audience,
so that certain inappropriate ref tag settings _don't_ get made.
"unless it’s somehow still used on signage"
I would expect that to be the case.
With the US DOT/FHA quasi-mandatory (compliance conditional greenmail)
renumberings to the revised national standard (exits keyed to mile marker,
border-to-border S-N or W-E, following US Interstate route number --
4 matches
Mail list logo