On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > * you have developed a certain way to map certain objects, that might
> > be a little out of touch with what is considered the "right" approach
> > elsewhere in the project, but you don't notice or care
>
> In the
I remain listening as to what OSM might best do with the network= tag on Amtrak
routes. Some additional research (Wikipedia) reveals that "Amtrak services
fall into three groups: short-haul service on the Northeast Corridor,
state-supported short haul service outside the Northeast Corridor, an
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> * you have developed a certain way to map certain objects, that might
> be a little out of touch with what is considered the "right" approach
> elsewhere in the project, but you don't notice or care
Adding to which...
I think half the problem is that the wiki documentation
Hi,
On 03.04.2018 02:20, Clay Smalley wrote:
> I'm... shocked. This is a really confrontational way of addressing
> things, and it really doesn't make me feel good contributing here.
Without knowing you, or the particulars of the mapping, or the other
mapper, let me suggest one thing: Try to see
What are "node hoarders" and "node police mappers"? Up to now, I've never
heard either term.
Cheers,
Dave
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Greg Morgan wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Clay Smalley
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I'm... shocked. This is a really confrontational way of address
5 matches
Mail list logo