Re: [Talk-us] Footway tagging

2019-04-21 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 1:30 PM Michael Sidoric via Talk-us < talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > Another consideration is accessibility. > Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs > to be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or > a

Re: [Talk-us] trail tagging

2019-04-21 Thread Rihards
On 19.04.19 19:34, Kevin Kenny wrote: ... > the surface. (There's also a law that snowshoes or skis are required > once the snow is 20 cm deep, but I follow "don't tag the local > legislation". There's nothing in that law regarding crampons, but any > time I've been using crampons and met a ranger,

Re: [Talk-us] Footway tagging

2019-04-21 Thread Rihards
On 21.04.19 23:18, Michael Sidoric via Talk-us wrote: > > Another consideration is accessibility. > Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to > be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or > accessible. > > I map for several blin

[Talk-us] Footway tagging

2019-04-21 Thread Michael Sidoric via Talk-us
Another consideration is accessibility. Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or accessible. I map for several blind friends and many paths have unexpected (and dangerous) overhead h

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2019-04-19

2019-04-21 Thread Dave Hansen
These are based off of Lambertus's work here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by asking on the talk-us@ l