On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 1:30 PM Michael Sidoric via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Another consideration is accessibility.
> Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs
> to be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or
> a
On 19.04.19 19:34, Kevin Kenny wrote:
...
> the surface. (There's also a law that snowshoes or skis are required
> once the snow is 20 cm deep, but I follow "don't tag the local
> legislation". There's nothing in that law regarding crampons, but any
> time I've been using crampons and met a ranger,
On 21.04.19 23:18, Michael Sidoric via Talk-us wrote:
>
> Another consideration is accessibility.
> Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to
> be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or
> accessible.
>
> I map for several blin
Another consideration is accessibility.
Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to
be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or
accessible.
I map for several blind friends and many paths have unexpected (and dangerous)
overhead h
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@ l
5 matches
Mail list logo