How much consensus IS there for tagging national_park on "large, (important?)
state parks" which roughly (or not) meet the national_park definition in our
wiki?
We have two in New York, quite a few in California, some in other states. Do
we wish to keep these as they are? Do we rough out "rul
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 2:43 PM OSM Volunteer stevea
wrote:
> 1) As states are as sovereign as the federal government (for purposes of
> saying "what a park is around here"), the tag boundary=national_park has
> rather widely been applied to state parks and state-park like lands. (I know
> Ke
Oops, I meant landuse=recreation_ground. (Not landuse=recreation_area). My
apologies.
SteveA
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
James Umbanhowar wrote:
> Just to throw another curveball in here, there is also
> leisure=nature_reserve which is frequently (occasionally?) used for the
> city/county parks that are less structured and used for hiking and
> nature appreciation.
Thanks, James. Reiterating, when I say "Existing
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, 18:35 Greg Troxel wrote:
> I think the entire "national_park" tag is unfortunate, as it wraps up a
> lot of concepts that vary by country, and makes people understand things
> when they don't. In the US, it should mean "preserve the land while
> allowing access and enjoymen
Just to throw another curveball in here, there is also
leisure=nature_reserve which is frequently (occasionally?) used for the
city/county parks that are less structured and used for hiking and
nature appreciation.
On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 08:48 -0500, Aaron Forsythe wrote:
> On 4/26/2019 9:49 PM, OS
On Apr 28, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Josh Lee wrote:
> Where is the consensus or vote? The wiki page says "Status: de facto"
> which implies that the wiki page should document *actual usage* and
> not some sort of idealist, narrow viewpoint.
Perhaps this is where I throw up my hands in exasperation. Wit
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 12:10 PM OSM Volunteer stevea
wrote:
> Does OSM tag these leisure=park? "We" (the people, the Departments of
> Parks...) do, yet should we in OSM? This IS talk-us; a major reason I
> brought this up here is that USA park tagging drifts from elsewhere as "more
> genero
> Jmapb wrote:
> ...if I saw a playground on a map
> and then arrived there and found it was just an empty lot or an
> undeveloped bit of land, I would find fault with that map. So if these
> places (kids play here but it's unofficial) are to be mapped, I'd
> suggest different tagging.
I would fi
On 4/26/2019 9:49 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
>> Other than that I can't think of any tags that would be applicable to
>> these sorts of situations. We tend to tag the regulations themselves,
>> not the extent to which they're adhered to. Certainly just calling it a
>> park because kids play th
10 matches
Mail list logo
