On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:12 PM OSM Volunteer stevea
wrote:
> I myself have also used landuse=conservation (long ago) and/or
> leisure=nature_reserve (neither of which render, not really the point).
My understanding is that landuse=conservation is deprecated in favor
of boundary=protected_area.
Apologies if I've already answered these.
On Apr 24, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I think Kevin has it right that we should tag primarily by something
> about land use, not by owne/operator, although it's fine to tag
> operator.
I 100% agree. Yet I peruse landuse key values (except pa
The linguist in me feels compelled to be a bit pedantic: terms like "plain
language" and "human language" used to distinguish between data/code/machine
kinds of "language," including what we mean by "tagging" or "codepoint" are, I
believe, well-expressed with the (linguistic community) phrase "
At today's creation of https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Key:park:type , I
introduce a proposal to reduce usage of the park:type tag (initially, in the
USA) with the goal of better clarifying USA park tagging. There are a couple
of "low hanging fruit" tasks we might do as a pilot run, though past
4 matches
Mail list logo
