Thanks for all the feedback, especially from Kevin.
I will create road route relations as suggested, as I come across them.
---
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:35:28 -0700, Mark Wagner wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:45:19 +0900
> tj-osmw...@lowsnr.net wrote:
>
> > Newby here.
> >
> > Started map
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:54 PM Bradley White
wrote:
>
> > A relation for all would be ok too, as long as the private inholdings
are
> > not removed from the NF (which I think has been done in some cases).
>
>
> IMO, a tagging scheme that better represents the meaning of these two
> boundaries wo
>> A relation for all would be ok too, as long as the private inholdings are
>> not removed from the NF (which I think has been done in some cases).
>
Bradley White writes
> I've argued for this in the past on this mailing list, but have since
> come around to disagreeing with this position over
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@ l
4 matches
Mail list logo