> Un-surveyable data is a nuisance for everyone working with OSM data;
except for those mappers which it empowers by telling said mappers
where they are allowed to survey, and probably others.
> it disempowers the mapper who works with the data because they have
> to simply accept it as a fact if
On 2012-12-29 12:11AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28.12.2012 22:16, Jason Remillard wrote:
> >So the question is, what should the exact criteria be for including an
> >"open space" parcel in OSM. Consider some of the various types of
> >property.
>
> I'd say anything that is observable on
2 matches
Mail list logo
