On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Scott Atwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Scott Atwood
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Do any of the renderer support the notion of rendering the s
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Russ Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jessica Forbess writes:
> > whatever they're called. Frustrating to follow one, only to find it's
> > closed because it's the "rainy" season. Easy information to gather,
>
Bicycle Boulevards are based on european concepts, right? How do they
map things like this in the Netherlands? Or do they just take their
traffic-calmed, bicycle-friendly roads for granted over there?
I agree that mapping streets to indicate bicycles have pass-through
and cars don't is useful but
For expressways, I'd think the most valuable objective attribute would
be shoulder width. It's what I think about and look for when planning
cross country routes on state and county highways. And then the
renderer will have to create some rules for indicating helpful biking
widths.
I'm not sure ho
Hey,
I'm in Austin TX right now, and while looking for stuff to correct, I
noticed all of the boulevard streets have the two ways intertwined at
each intersection, messing up the oneway settings, and generally not
being right.
SteveC mentioned someone out there has a script to correct this
specif
5 matches
Mail list logo