FYI the user also joined the changeset discussion as of recently. Based on
the message and previous changeset comments (e.g. "trunk-primary fixes
(that i messed up)" in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79132672#map=12/28.4681/-81.4027)
it seems to be an honest mistake.
I can help out with
Hi Mango,
I'm glad you didn't get tired of adding all those buildings to OSM last
year.
I quickly checked Lee county's GIS resources and it appears that there's
even a more complete building footprint dataset that contains way more data
than the condo footprints (even single family homes) file
Dear all,
Sorry for cross-posting. Please see the announcement of the Academic Track
at the global State of the Map 2019 in Heidelberg, Germany. We are looking
for scientific contributions (abstracts between 500 and 800 words) by May
10, 2019. This is a great opportunity to showcase your OSM
Maybe I am missing something here but when I checked the link you provided
I can see the proper attribution displayed in the Leaflet map. Screenshot:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EBzE3_0Lc6qVkKeYYhYbpz9CFrWOiGpc/view
Cheers,
Levente
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:51 PM Steve Friedl wrote:
>
Great stuff, Leif! I will catch up with this project over the weekend and
will provide some input.
I have access to a few workstations with a bunch of memory so I can help
out with converting/processing the input data if needed. Just let me know.
I don't think of the size of these datasets as an
Hey,
As far as licenses go, these datasets are public domain so no other action
is needed.
As for all the other things, we gave this project a try in 2016 and
imported a large chunk of Large Buildings with address points back then. It
was meant to be a community project where we aimed to engage
6 matches
Mail list logo
