I do not think that the copyright is compatible with OSM use as written. The
statement I find most relevant is All content, including but not limited to,
the design, graphics, and photographic media are copyrighted by the AARoads
webmasters or their respective contributors. This appears on
From the page which Bryce referred to in
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-September/011738.html
comes the following passage:
The term ZCTA was created to differentiate between this entity and true USPS
ZIP Codes.
ZCTA is a trademark of the U.S. Census Bureau; ZIP Code is a
Maybe I should clarify what my point really was ... one needs to choose whether they are mapping ZCTAs or ZIP Codes and not confound the two. That was what I was getting at. Regards --ceyockey
___
Agreed -- looks very nice. Thank you. It would be very useful, I think, to
have a layer which presents the currently available USGS topomaps for two
reasons: first, as a reference to illustrate improvements; second, as a
reference to illustrate gaps. Also, I should know, but what is the
Good to use the new http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us list for
this topic. --Courtland (ceyockey)
-Original Message-
From: Sailor Jerry sailorje...@scmarinetech.com
Sent: Jan 16, 2013 1:17 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports]
(this is a follow-up post to my original at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html and
the responses thereto)
Thanks for the input on this topic earlier this month. I'm in agreement with
those who feel that the information is too volatile and potentially out
Likewise for highways crossing waterways; there are plenty of places where there is neither a bridge nor tunnel where the two intersect. More subtle would be also looking for layer problems where two ways cross and there is a bridge or tunnel, but there are no layer tags. --ceyockey-Original
I have updated the mailing lists page in the wiki
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mailing_lists), adding this new list.
--ceyockey
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I know that the TIGER 2012 overlay available in JOSM has been very helpful and
I think that a combination of a) increasing awareness of this overlay and b)
making the overlay available in Potlatch would go a long way toward leveraging
TIGER 2012. In general, I think it is not the geometry
Whoa! Source is a deprecated tag, having been for years?! Good grief - the
wiki has no indication that this is the case;
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source . Could someone please confirm
that source is a deprecated tag and that it should no longer be used? --ceyockey
I am generally opposed to importation of parcel data at the individual parcel level. This goes _directly_ to the design of OSM with a non-layered data model and the resultant massive increase in rendered data density.However, there is much information in local GIS datastores about subdivision and
{{key|border_type}} is described as an alternative and sometimes complement to
{{key|admin_level}} . I have recently been drawing subdivision boundaries
based on County GIS data and including {{tag|border_type|subdivision}} as part
of a relation of type border; see for instance
I am interested in what tagging you would suggest to indicate that a stretch of
road has been adopted as part of an Adopt-a-Highway program.
Quoting from the Wikipedia article: The Adopt-a-Highway program, also known as
Sponsor-a-Highway (but see distinction below), is a promotional campaign
Thanks for your comments, Serge. I'm confused by your reference to changeset
metadata as that is not easily accessible to future editors of the same ways.
It would put informative content remove from the editing process.
I've made reply comments in-line below.
--ceyockey
-Original
14 matches
Mail list logo