If nobody objects I'll start uploading the towns from the admin8 file and stow
file
I noticed that a couple of the counties are only relations (i.e. the ways
aren't tagged admin_level=6) so no lines are going to go in there.
With this done all borders in Mass will be represented by a tagged
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
If nobody objects I'll start uploading the towns from the admin8 file and
stow file
Dear Calvin,
I have an objection and a suggestion. See below.
I noticed that a couple of the counties are only
for their own towns.
Does that make sense ?
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:50 AM
To: Metcalf, Calvin
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org; impo...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MA towns
On Thu, Oct 20
To: Metcalf, Calvin
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org; impo...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MA towns
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
If nobody objects I'll start uploading the towns from the
admin8 file and stow file
Dear
Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:50 AM
To: Metcalf, Calvin
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org; impo...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MA towns
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc
* Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us [2011-10-20 12:26 -0400]:
It retags all ways that make up counties to be admin_level=6;8
As I understand the conventions, a way should be tagged with the lowest
admin_level applicable, so if it's a member of an admin_level=8 relation and
an
as there
is a village that is not contiguous with counties or municipalities (but is
contiguous with a zip code).
-Original Message-
From: Phil! Gold [mailto:phi...@pobox.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 1:32 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MA
Upon doing some research this makes sense, going to wipe the lower values
-Original Message-
From: Phil! Gold [mailto:phi...@pobox.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 1:32 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] MA towns
* Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com writes:
Starting with Stow, (is this the right Stow?)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.4237lon=-71.5119zoom=13layers=M
you might decide that the existing town border is correct-enough, then
merge the Worcester / Middlesex border to the town line where they
Ok uploading.
The linework that didn't make it in (i.e. border's contagious with counties or
towns that were already done) can be found at the link bellow for those who
would like to help clean this up.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/37626989/other.xml
-Original Message-
From: Greg Troxel
Thanks for uploading these borders.
Building on my recently added relations for Tyngsborough and
Dunstable, I decided to create a relation for Chelmsford. On the
Chelmsford/Westford border you created 7 overlapping Ways, so I
deleted 6 of them and then added the remaining one to the relation.
Also havn't tagged the coastline or set the direction of the ways yet
Sent with Verizon Mobile Email
---Original Message---
From: Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us
Sent: 10/19/2011 3:40 pm
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org, impo...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Imports] MA towns
ok so
12 matches
Mail list logo
