Claudius, The registration is off by between 75-200' in some areas. On top of that, some of the patterns mkgmap uses when rendering to Garmin .IMG format tend to bog down the processor on my Nuvi. I can live with the clutter in mapnik & osmrender, but since I'm using the weekly mkgmap render service at http://garmin.na1400.info/, I don't have any control over the renderer as you suggest.
I'll have to pull up the details of the bulk import project, but many of the polygones look like zoning commision plats. I've driven through a number of business and residential areas that are still marked as "forest" or "farm/cropland." Here's a permalink to an example area along the TN/GA border. Note how the "Transportation/Communications" polygon is about 250 meters west of I-75. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.9548&lon=-85.1756&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF Chris On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Claudius <claudiu...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 10.07.2009 03:48, Chris Hunter: > > I'm working on reviewing and updating the TIGER imports along the TN/GA > > border, and I noticed that GA is extremely cluttered in both mapnic and > > osmrender. I pulled up an area near my home in JOSM and it seems that > > there are quite a few landuse polygons that were imported from the > > USGS/LULC dataset. > > > > What is the best way to tag these so that they don't clutter up the map > > above say, zoom level 13? > > Do you have a map link to an example area. Generally: If the data is > correct leave it like that and fix the rendering rules :) If not: Fix > the data. > > Claudius > > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > newb...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
