On 25.05.2013 12:15, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> On 25/mag/2013, at 10:33, Paweł Paprota wrote:
>
> > Of course with Wikipedia it was somehow "easier" because all of
> > their work gets indexed by search engines
>
>
> Also osm is indexed by search engines
When Google returns results point
On 26/mag/2013, at 13:03, Paweł Paprota wrote:
> Well of course when you put "osm" in the search query you will get results
> from OSM.org... but it kind of defeats the purpose - the point is to promote
> OSM to people who don't know about it, isn't it?
you only get these results because
Am 25/mag/2013 um 12:22 schrieb Paweł Paprota :
> Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in the
> internet?
Yes, I noted this because of a misspelled street name, but it also works for
correctly spelled ones, if you put osm to the search term you'll see them
so
Paweł Paprota writes:
> Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in
> the internet?
Sure. I link to them all the time (warning, these are all associated
with railroads, so if you're not a railfan, click at your peril!):
This search:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/s/ope
On 5/25/2013 6:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Also osm is indexed by search engines
To varying levels - I searched OSM for some unusual POI names from
January 2013, and they aren't indexed. I did notice some content
indexed from 2010.
___
Tal
On 25/mag/2013, at 10:33, Paweł Paprota wrote:
> Of course with Wikipedia it was somehow "easier" because all of their
> work gets indexed by search engines
Also osm is indexed by search engines
cheers
Martin
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@open
6 matches
Mail list logo