(this is a follow-up post to my original at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html and
the responses thereto)
Thanks for the input on this topic earlier this month. I'm in agreement with
those who feel that the information is too volatile and potentially out
this should also go to the tagging list.
On 1/12/13 9:08 AM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
(this is a follow-up post to my original at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-January/010086.html and
the responses thereto)
Thanks for the input on this topic earlier this month.
To play Psychostik's advocate, translating girl directions. OK, now
stay right while you're turning left, because you're going to hang a right
after seriously the biggest tree you've ever seen, go five lampposts down,
turn left on McCallaugh...or was it McDowell? McSomething. Then you'll
-Original Message-
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 1, 2013 9:31 PM
To: dies38...@mypacks.net
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Adopt-a-highway representation in OSM
Off list.
I see you've put source and source:date tags on many objects.
source on objects has been deprecated for years.
I
, but not surprising. I've fixed the documentation and added
a section about the old use.
- Serge
-Original Message-
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 1, 2013 9:31 PM
To: dies38...@mypacks.net
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Adopt-a-highway representation in OSM
Off list.
I see
On 1/1/13 7:32 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I am interested in what tagging you would suggest to indicate that a stretch of road has
been adopted as part of an Adopt-a-Highway program.
unrelated to the source amenity tagging discussion...
i think that maybe adapt-a-highway is probably an
it seems to me to be a likely maintenance problem in the long run.
I know in Canada it certainly is! There are two adopt-a-highway signs where
I live and both of the clubs that supposedly 'maintain' that part of the
highway stopped participating in the program 7 years ago. The signs have
and added
a section about the old use.
- Serge
-Original Message-
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 1, 2013 9:31 PM
To: dies38...@mypacks.net
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Adopt-a-highway representation in OSM
Off list.
I see you've put source and source:date tags
On 1/2/13 1:20 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote:
Is there a difference between deprecated and now used less frequently?
Deprecated sounds pretty official, especially in our unofficious (word?)
OSM society.
in my experience, deprecated is a pretty official declaration that
something shouldn't
be
On 1/2/2013 2:16 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
in my experience, deprecated is a pretty official declaration that
something shouldn't
be done/used anymore. java developers like me are quite accustomed to
seeing
APIs we use suddenly coming up deprecated, leading us to scramble to
the docs
to see what
Exactly. Where are these official declarations posted inside OSM?
For example, Serge indicated source=* has been deprecated. Where is this
(should this be) recorded?
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
deprecated is a pretty official declaration that
On 1/2/13 2:45 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote:
Exactly. Where are these official declarations posted inside OSM?
For example, Serge indicated source=* has been deprecated. Where is this
(should this be) recorded?
normally you'd indicate deprecation on the page for the tag itself.
i'm not sure we have
The only real tag that is well and truly deprecated is created_by.
Both JOSM and Potlatch automatically and silently delete this tag from
any object you modify if it is present. So it is actually impossible
to create a new object with a created_by tag on it in the two most
popular editors.
Toby
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org wrote:
Is there a difference between deprecated and now used less frequently?
I've tried to use generally deprecated for Not used much and should
not be used much. Where I've failed to do that, I apologize.
Remember that virtually
On 1/2/13 10:49 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 1/1/13 7:32 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I am interested in what tagging you would suggest to indicate that a
stretch of road has been adopted as part of an Adopt-a-Highway
program.
unrelated to the source amenity tagging discussion...
i
To play Psychostik's advocate, translating girl directions. OK, now stay
right while you're turning left, because you're going to hang a right after
seriously the biggest tree you've ever seen, go five lampposts down, turn
left on McCallaugh...or was it McDowell? McSomething. Then you'll keep
I am interested in what tagging you would suggest to indicate that a stretch of
road has been adopted as part of an Adopt-a-Highway program.
Quoting from the Wikipedia article: The Adopt-a-Highway program, also known as
Sponsor-a-Highway (but see distinction below), is a promotional campaign
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:32 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I am interested in what tagging you would suggest to indicate that a stretch
of road has been adopted as part of an Adopt-a-Highway program.
My thinking right now would be to include at the way level these additional
tags:
Message-
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 1, 2013 7:54 PM
To: dies38...@mypacks.net
Cc: osm talk us talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Adopt-a-highway representation in OSM
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:32 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I am interested in what tagging
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:33 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
Thanks for your comments, Serge. I'm confused by your reference to changeset
metadata as that is not easily accessible to future editors of the same ways.
Changeset tags are accessible to editors just as easily accessible as
.
--ceyockey
-Original Message-
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 1, 2013 7:54 PM
To: dies38...@mypacks.net
Cc: osm talk us talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Adopt-a-highway representation in OSM
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:32 PM, dies38...@mypacks.net
21 matches
Mail list logo
