Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-13 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 3/13/2012 5:14 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 03/13/2012 08:20 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: If that is desirable, I can undelete the nodes and revert the ways thereafter. I'm willing to clean up if you do this. Thanks. Done, all ways in Montana and Idaho reverted clean. Hmmm - now ther

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-13 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 03/13/2012 08:20 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: If that is desirable, I can undelete the nodes and revert the ways thereafter. I'm willing to clean up if you do this. Thanks. Done, all ways in Montana and Idaho reverted clean. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.or

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-13 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 3/13/2012 9:33 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/problems.html (The "what nodes" column lists the nodes missing for a revert.) If that is desirable, I can undelete the nodes and revert the ways thereafter. I'm willing to clean up if you do this. Thanks. _

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-13 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, I will probably undelete all deleted ways and then revert the relations to re-add them, except where the stray nodes were already cleaned up (assuming that in these areas, a human mapper has evaluated the situation and fixed it). We'll see how that goes. Turns out that about 6,000 of 22,0

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 3/12/2012 5:28 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: I will probably undelete all deleted ways and then revert the relations to re-add them, except where the stray nodes were already cleaned up (assuming that in these areas, a human mapper has evaluated the situation and fixed it). We'll see how that goes

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-12 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 03/12/2012 09:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: The changeset in question is problematic for two reasons; one is that it deletes a (small number of) objects in the US instead of just things in Canada, and the other is that even in Canada it deleted more than Canadians had decided to delete r

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 3/12/2012 3:45 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: The changeset in question is problematic for two reasons; one is that it deletes a (small number of) objects in the US instead of just things in Canada, and the other is that even in Canada it deleted more than Canadians had decided to delete right now.

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-12 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 03/12/2012 08:12 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511 is labeled "remove non-relicensable imports in Canada by request of Canadian community", yet includes a number of deletions in the U.S. The changeset is too large for JOSM's reverter plugin

[Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

2012-03-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511 is labeled "remove non-relicensable imports in Canada by request of Canadian community", yet includes a number of deletions in the U.S. The changeset is too large for JOSM's reverter plugin, and I can't download the osmChange XML. Frederik