With these split relations, ways should have forward/backwards, relations should have cardinal directions in a super relation. Gets to be a real pain in the ass when ways are using cardinal direction roles.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Minh Nguyen <m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> wrote: > At least ten miles of I-275 near Cincinnati are consistently signed as > north/southbound on guide signs [1] and reassurance markers [2] but > consistently signed as east/westbound on tenth-mile markers [3] and ramp > name signs, as well as in ODOT's straight line diagram [4]. > > What roles should these ways have in the I-275 route relation? They're > currently "north" and "south" with a note describing the contradiction. [5] > Would it be better to change the roles to "north;east" and "south;west"? > Should we revert to "forward" in weird cases like these? (It's bad enough > that this is Circle Freeway, in which each direction already refers to > disconnected segments in 2-3 different states.) > > [1] <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ufaXmzVwXv5vWJM_PsDJtw> > <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/pcZJlkRsAPG7MRApWOwT_Q> > <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/BWbzCJflIUvwV8u8bskaaw> > > [2] <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/nfX2M7XTTeHxSR7PvTVW3g> > > [3] <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/HpzPH_tPp-x_A8WXBBCplA> > <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/LkDSrQekv5nnAu1-hhGZ-w> > > [4] <http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/TechServ/ > TIM/Documents/SLD/pdf_files/HAMir0275r.pdf> > > [4] For example, <http://osm.org/way/31563007> > > -- > m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us