On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 4:31 PM Michael Sidoric via Talk-us
wrote:
> Another consideration is accessibility.
> Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to
> be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or
> accessible.
>
> I map for
On 21.04.19 23:18, Michael Sidoric via Talk-us wrote:
>
> Another consideration is accessibility.
> Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to
> be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or
> accessible.
>
> I map for several
Another consideration is accessibility.
Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to
be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or
accessible.
I map for several blind friends and many paths have unexpected (and dangerous)
overhead
3 matches
Mail list logo
