On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Max Erickson wrote:
> Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see
> any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to
> line up with what the state says.
>
This. If the HFCS is known, add that in a separate tag. This can
Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see
any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to
line up with what the state says.
Max
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.o
Hello all,
So for the past few months, user UAN51 (I've invited him to join this
thread) has been applying MODOT's Highway Functional Classification System
(HFCS) to primary and lower roads in the KCMO area. This has led to some
things (like part of US 169 and US 69 being secondary roads, MO 2
3 matches
Mail list logo