On 7/10/2012 5:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Oh, and South Carolina. Not going to touch that.
Don't Tread on Us - LOL.
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Hi,
On 07/11/12 13:59, Mike N wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that area?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ##
On 7/11/2012 8:38 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/12 13:59, Mike N wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that
On 7/11/2012 8:38 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/12 13:59, Mike N wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that
Hi,
On 07/11/12 15:20, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that area?
Yes, wherever those TIGER
On 7/11/2012 9:31 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/12 15:20, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import
On 07/11/2012 09:31 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Obviously my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek; I am personally
convinced that the unedited TIGER landscape - i.e. a map of which
virtually nothing is correct and once you start to work somewhere you
have to touch almost every single object if you
Kevin,
On 07/11/12 16:20, Kevin Kenny wrote:
The data checks in JOSM and Potlatch2 are fine in that they all
indeed highlight potential problems.
As RichardF has pointed out, Potlatch2 sorely lacks any kind of data
check. With the exception of unconnected road ends flashing aggressively.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
The culture of
OSM seems to be veering from bad data happens, and when it does,
other mappers fix it, to we have to protect the map from the
mappers.
Not from mappers, from disruptive bots.
Hi,
On 11.07.2012 17:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
As RichardF has pointed out, Potlatch2 sorely lacks any kind of data
check. With the exception of unconnected road ends flashing aggressively.
I have been informed that I have no clue, and P2 never did that.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ##
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have been informed that I have no clue
Actually the phrase I used was that Frederik clearly knows as much about
Potlatch as I do about JOSM. (But I suspect more.)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
,
but at least having the roads in there is better than nothing.
-Compdude
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:31 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fwd: [OSM-dev] Licence redaction ready to begin
Hi
I've just ensured that the OSMF will do minimal damage to the U.S.
railway network outside the Los Angeles area. Most of the damage will be
moving nodes, meaning that geometry may be totally borked but topology
will be fine.
___
Talk-us mailing list
On 7/10/2012 5:40 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I've just ensured that the OSMF will do minimal damage to the U.S.
railway network outside the Los Angeles area.
Oh, and South Carolina. Not going to touch that.
Most of the damage will be
moving nodes, meaning that geometry may be totally
On 7/10/2012 6:15 PM, Charlotte Wolter wrote: Nathan,
How did you ensure that the railroads will be damaged minimally
Using JOSM's license change plugin. If the OSMF uses a different
algorithm, we're all screwed.
(and why is poor old LA excluded)?
Because there's a lot of work and I can
Forwarding from talk/dev
Note that the date given (9th) should be 11th
So we may see things starting to happen here in the US within the next
week or two.
Toby
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
Date: Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:46 PM
Subject:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Forwarding from talk/dev
Note that the date given (9th) should be 11th
So we may see things starting to happen here in the US within the next
week or two.
Awesome! Thank you, devs, for your work on the tools for this.
17 matches
Mail list logo
