Sure. Tagging incorrectly for the renderer is what "map for the renderer"
means.
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Mike N*
Date: Friday, May 11, 2012
Subject: [Talk-us] Fixing TIGER street name abbreviations
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On 5/11/2012 1:36 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
> O
The examples are contrived because we're not testing. We're pointing out
why this is a bad idea. Using real world examples would just encourage
people to fix those examples and ignore the fact that the process is wrong.
Anyway, you realize that the road type doesn't always appear after the base
But Serge IS testing. He is building and testing a script that is
conservative and gives feedback on what it isn't sure about. That info can
be used for future scripts, or manual edits.
He is only editing ways originally imported by tiger, based on the tiger
prefix, suffix, road type, and base na
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Dale Puch wrote:
> He is only editing ways originally imported by tiger, based on the tiger
> prefix, suffix, road type, and base name. If all were rev 1 unedited
> imports it would work darn well. The testing is mostly for bad tiger data
> and subsequent edits t
He posted the script! You read thru and test it if you do not trust him,
which you just came out and said you do not.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Dale Puch wrote:
> > He is only editing ways originally imported by tiger, based on the tiger
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Dale Puch wrote:
> He posted the script! You read thru and test it if you do not trust him,
> which you just came out and said you do not.
Trust him about what? I never said I don't trust him. What makes you
think I did?
___
6 matches
Mail list logo
