Thanks for those details, Kevin. The comparison is very helpful. The GMNF
seems to have only 3 classifications that I've been able to find:
- Wilderness -- which should probably be protected_class=1b
- National Recreation Area -- protected_class=5 (Wikipedia page
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jason Remillard
wrote:
> hstore support, which would allow rendering boundary=protected_area is
> being actively worked on the main style sheet. Its coming...
>
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1504
>
Hi Kevin,
hstore support, which would allow rendering boundary=protected_area is
being actively worked on the main style sheet. Its coming...
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1504
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1975
Otherwise, I agree with
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Adam Franco wrote:
> Thanks for another fabulously detailed reply Kevin!
>
> So it sounds like I'm on the right track then and it makes sense to leave
> the broad outer boundaries as *boundary=national_park* and use the
>
Thanks for another fabulously detailed reply Kevin!
So it sounds like I'm on the right track then and it makes sense to leave
the broad outer boundaries as *boundary=national_park* and use the
*boundary=protected_area
+ leisure=nature_reserve* combo for the smaller US Forest Service-owned
My big issue with this is that we - alas! - need to have something "tagged
for the renderer."
Over on the other side of Lake Champlain and the Taconics, we have the same
problem with the Catskill and Adirondack Parks, which are protected areas
with an immense public-private partnership.
Hello all,
I'm planning to do some cleanup of the Green Mountain National Forest in
Vermont and figured it might be useful to provide the opportunity for
feedback before embarking on this project.
The Green Mountain National forest is currently mapped as two large
outer-area relations that
7 matches
Mail list logo