On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Mike N. wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Richard Welty
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> if by 2 lane freeway, you mean a "super 2", by convention those are
>>> usually trunk in the US.
>>
>> I mean what some roadgeeks call a "super 2", which isn't necessarily
>> the sa
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 12:08 -0500, Mike N. wrote:
> > It looks fairly unedited since the TIGER upload:
>
> I see that there's been a new edit since I did my analysis, but still
> quite unedited.
>
> > I take it you're going to follow the best-practices import procedures,
> > like using a new a
It looks fairly unedited since the TIGER upload:
I see that there's been a new edit since I did my analysis, but still
quite unedited.
I take it you're going to follow the best-practices import procedures,
like using a new and unique OSM userid?
I believe the new and unique OSM userid i
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Richard Welty
wrote:
if by 2 lane freeway, you mean a "super 2", by convention those are
usually trunk in the US.
I mean what some roadgeeks call a "super 2", which isn't necessarily
the same as what others use that term for. Two-lane freeway is a more
precise
It looks fairly unedited since the TIGER upload:
http://open.mapquestapi.com/tigerviewer/index.html?zoom=11&lat=34.50629&lon=-96.84501&layers=B
But, it would be nice of you to go through and contact the folks who
have done editing in there just to double-check that it's OK to blow
away their work
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
> if by 2 lane freeway, you mean a "super 2", by convention those are
> usually trunk in the US.
I mean what some roadgeeks call a "super 2", which isn't necessarily
the same as what others use that term for. Two-lane freeway is a more
precise
On 1/2/11 11:18 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Mike N. wrote:
3. The 'Chickasaw Turnpike' toll road OSM classification is a question
mark - I left it as secondary because it is not grade-separated carriageway,
but I believe it qualifies as trunk. Any other ro
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Mike N. wrote:
> 3. The 'Chickasaw Turnpike' toll road OSM classification is a question
> mark - I left it as secondary because it is not grade-separated carriageway,
> but I believe it qualifies as trunk. Any other road reclassifications for
> this area?
It'
This might get me strung up on the yardarm, but I propose
1.) Mapping in a place I've never been to
2.) Doing an import for a single county from the county's GIS data
Background: Murray County's (Oklahoma) roads were recently renamed for E911
purposes. This data is as-of 11/29/2010 - newer
9 matches
Mail list logo