On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>
> They weren't duplicated. Ian (I believe?) imported the borders for
> the New England and Mid-Atlantic states and I imported the rest.
>
It might be the county border imports. I imported those without doing any
polygon-overlap-detection
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> I've adjusted the boundary=admin rendering on my tile server to make
> more sense for North America. Rendering the state / provincial borders
> at zoom 1 & 2 might be overdoing it, but at zoom 3 looks reasonable. It
> does point out a poten
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> Borders for Vermont and New York appear "bolder" than for Minnesota and
> Illinois. Have they been tagged differently, or duplicated?
an additional possibility is eastern borders are more wiggly following
terrain as opposed to ruler on a ma
I've adjusted the boundary=admin rendering on my tile server to make
more sense for North America. Rendering the state / provincial borders
at zoom 1 & 2 might be overdoing it, but at zoom 3 looks reasonable. It
does point out a potential shortcoming in the boundary data though.
Borders for Vermo
4 matches
Mail list logo