Hi Nathan:
Good to see your thoughtful questions here on talk-us. I have seen
your edits and I believe you have a depth of knowledge about tagging
railroads already.
I believe in tagging attributes that we know to be true about things
as we edit them, or before we edit them. Tagging is
Hello got some questions about Railroads,
I have a passion for the preservation of railroads and the maps surrounding
them. I both update current map data with a line per each track. Track is
in most cases two rails attached by a sleeper or tie. I have over 10,000
edits over on GMM and under
On 11/10/2013 03:30 PM, nathan proudfoot wrote:
Hello got some questions about Railroads,
I have a passion for the preservation of railroads and the maps
surrounding them. I both update current map data with a line per each
track. Track is in most cases two rails attached by a sleeper or
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 18:26 -0600, John F. Eldredge wrote:
We probably need a value such as railway=inactive for routes that are
not in use, but still have the rails in place. The only problem is
that, if someone erroneously tags an active but little-used route as
inactive, this could lead
John,
As listed by James we have, railway=disused
I would not encourage hiking or rail-biking any of these routes as they
are in question by the tag of disused and most of these are still going to
be private property. Once abandoned it is no longer a railroad per-say.
Best Regards,
Nathan
5 matches
Mail list logo
