On 01/11/2015 07:32 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
However, north of the rotary for quite a while, it should just be
primary. There are intersections and lights all over the place, nothing
better than an ordinary US highwway that happens to have two lanes each
way. It's posted 40 and we really mean
(I'm writing from the perspective of having driven Route 6 from the
sagamore bridge to north eastham every summer for many years, and to
Provincetown a few years ago.)
If we're talking about where Route 6 goes from 2 lanes each direction
with a real median down to one lane in each direction with
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Zontine, Chris -(p) chr...@telenav.com
wrote:
While mapping a FIXME in the US this situation came up: WAY ID 8822153.
The FIXME implies this WAY (and others) should have a dual carriageway. As
you can see this is one long stretch of highway=motorway. What is
On 01/08/2015 06:02 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 1/8/15 5:57 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 1/8/2015 5:51 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i don't think this photo is relevant to the section that Chris is
talking
about; it's a different section of US 6. i think this road is in dire
need of a ground survey.
On 1/8/2015 3:13 PM, Zontine, Chris -(p) wrote:
Thanks for the research. I will change the highway to trunk and leave as a
single carriageway.
I found this old photo http://www.bostonroads.com/roads/mid-cape/ ,
which seems to approximately match the recent Bing. If it's still in
this
On 1/8/15 5:41 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 1/8/2015 3:13 PM, Zontine, Chris -(p) wrote:
Thanks for the research. I will change the highway to trunk and leave
as a single carriageway.
I found this old photo http://www.bostonroads.com/roads/mid-cape/ ,
which seems to approximately match the recent
On 1/8/2015 5:51 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
I found this old photo http://www.bostonroads.com/roads/mid-cape/ ,
which seems to approximately match the recent Bing. If it's still in
this configuration, a single carriageway is probably best. The double
double yellows would imply no turns and no
On 1/8/15 5:57 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 1/8/2015 5:51 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i don't think this photo is relevant to the section that Chris is
talking
about; it's a different section of US 6. i think this road is in dire
need of a ground survey.
Oops - I forgot to mention that it was the
While mapping a FIXME in the US this situation came up: WAY ID 8822153. The
FIXME implies this WAY (and others) should have a dual carriageway. As you can
see this is one long stretch of highway=motorway. What is the thought on this?
OSM Heat Map: http://yosmhm.neis-one.org/?ChrisZontine
OSM
On 1/8/15 1:03 PM, Zontine, Chris -(p) wrote:
While mapping a FIXME in the US this situation came up: WAY ID
8822153. The FIXME implies this WAY (and others) should have a dual
carriageway. As you can see this is one long stretch of
highway=motorway. What is the thought on this?
it looks
From Bing I am wondering it is isn't a super two (limited access, two way
road) which I think we've been tagging as highway=trunk.
If there is actually a barrier in the middle that is not visible in Bing, then
it should split into two separate one lane ways. Not sure I'd hang a motorway
tag on
: Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:43 AM
To: Richard Welty
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Should this be a dual carriageway?
From Bing I am wondering it is isn't a super two (limited access, two way
road) which I think we've been tagging as highway=trunk.
If there is actually
:43 AM
To: Richard Welty
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Should this be a dual carriageway?
From Bing I am wondering it is isn't a super two (limited access, two way
road) which I think we've been tagging as highway=trunk.
If there is actually a barrier in the middle
To: Richard Welty
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Should this be a dual carriageway?
From Bing I am wondering it is isn't a super two (limited access, two way
road) which I think we've been tagging as highway=trunk.
If there is actually a barrier in the middle
14 matches
Mail list logo
