On 7/15/2012 6:13 AM, Mike N wrote:
The Columbia, SC area is about to be burned by Sherman's redactor.
Any help for the 'roads' will be welcome.
A link:
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=10&lat=34.04041&lon=-81.07156&layers=00B
___
Talk-us mailing
On 7/13/2012 6:04 AM, Alexander Jones wrote:
Hello.
I have plently of spare time, and my home (San Antonio) has almost no
remapping to do. Where is my help most needed? I'm adept with relations, and
I practically redrew almost all of Visalia, CA. (100,000+ people) No GPS,
though. :(
The Col
Hello.
I have plently of spare time, and my home (San Antonio) has almost no
remapping to do. Where is my help most needed? I'm adept with relations, and
I practically redrew almost all of Visalia, CA. (100,000+ people) No GPS,
though. :(
Alexander
___
On 7/12/12 4:24 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 7/12/2012 11:27 AM, Clay Smalley wrote:
I like this idea. That would encourage more people to TIGER-review
streets, as highway=road shows up pretty ugly on Mapnik, and people like
getting rid of ugly. What would be the drawbacks of doing this? It se
Martijn van Exel schrieb:
I agree that residential is not the right classification, but
'unclassified' would be better than 'road', at least for halfway
built-up areas.
Well, "highway=road" means "road without classification" while
"highway=unclassified" is an actual classification (yes, confu
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mike N wrote:
>>
>> On 7/12/2012 11:26 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> I like that idea, especially given the high number of obviously not
>>> urban roads that would be better off tagged as track or
On 07/12/2012 12:01 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm still working on ones that should have been tagged
highway=imaginary. Ones that go over cliffs, splash along streambeds, or
otherwise do not and cannot ever have existed. (And I wonder just
how some of those made it into TIGER in the first place!)
On 7/12/2012 11:27 AM, Clay Smalley wrote:
I like this idea. That would encourage more people to TIGER-review
streets, as highway=road shows up pretty ugly on Mapnik, and people like
getting rid of ugly. What would be the drawbacks of doing this? It seems
like there would be some but I can't thin
On 7/12/2012 11:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I was wondering if something likehttp://frontdoor.cloudapp.net/ might be a
fun solution. Present some aerial imagery, the OSM data, and say "is this a
track or a road?". Kind of like HotOrNot for the OSM generation. (For extra
efficiency, have a bu
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mike N wrote:
> On 7/12/2012 11:26 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> I like that idea, especially given the high number of obviously not
>> urban roads that would be better off tagged as track or unclassified
>> getting counted as residential (a more urban classificati
On 7/12/2012 11:26 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I like that idea, especially given the high number of obviously not
urban roads that would be better off tagged as track or unclassified
getting counted as residential (a more urban classification). I'd be
willing to extend this idea to any way tagged t
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
>>
>> Richard Weait schrieb:
>>
>>> Larger cleanups can be imposing at first glance. Other mappers will
>>> understand that a single mapper can't do everything at once, so you
>>> sh
Robert Kaiser wrote:
> After having spent another vacation in the US (in Northern
> California this time), I started wondering if there should be
> a mass edit to switch all the highway=residential (or other
> highway values set en masse and mostly wrong) that are from
> TIGER imports and still
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Richard Weait schrieb:
>
>> Larger cleanups can be imposing at first glance. Other mappers will
>> understand that a single mapper can't do everything at once, so you
>> shouldn't be criticized if you fix a few things but not others.
>
I like this idea. That would encourage more people to TIGER-review streets,
as highway=road shows up pretty ugly on Mapnik, and people like getting rid
of ugly. What would be the drawbacks of doing this? It seems like there
would be some but I can't think of any.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:29 AM, R
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Richard Weait schrieb:
>
> Larger cleanups can be imposing at first glance. Other mappers will
>> understand that a single mapper can't do everything at once, so you
>> shouldn't be criticized if you fix a few things but not others.
>>
>
>
Richard Weait schrieb:
Larger cleanups can be imposing at first glance. Other mappers will
understand that a single mapper can't do everything at once, so you
shouldn't be criticized if you fix a few things but not others.
After having spent another vacation in the US (in Northern California
On 7/11/2012 3:56 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote:
If people don't want to do the TIGER fixup all over again, they could import
the TIGER 2011 data which is of MUCH better quality than the TIGER data that
was originally imported into OSM (though not quite perfect). In fact, I
sometimes use the TIGER da
ailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:19 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] TIGER fixup and mapping "more"
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> I'd be fine with trying to clean up unedited TIGER - or even a
> "horrible
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> I'd be fine with trying to clean up unedited TIGER - or even a
> "horrible mess of half-deleted TIGER" - if the expectations of
> the results weren't quite so daunting.
[ ... ]
Larger cleanups can be imposing at first glance. Other mappers
20 matches
Mail list logo
