Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

Guam now has its Municipalities entered as boundary=administrative + admin_level=6. I also changed several named and human-settled areas from place=locality (which means uninhabited) to place=hamlet. Hamlet seems appropriate as there appear to be no more than one or two hundred persons and

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

Josh Lee writes: "TIGER Line gives these village boundaries in the "County Subdivisions" file." Thank you, I'm taking a look now. Effectively closing this thread, SteveA California ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

Thank you, Nelson.  Per the link (and a further link, which points to Simon Poole for the OSMF License Group):"But while neither CC nor the OSMF has undertaken a complete compatibility analysis, we have identified at least one  point of incompatibility and one possible challenge regarding

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:03 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: >> Max Erickson writes: >> >> The image the linked image was traced from provides no provenance >> (beyond "Own work"). It's tough to go from there to being sure that >> derived data is

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

> Max Erickson writes: > > The image the linked image was traced from provides no provenance > (beyond "Own work"). It's tough to go from there to being sure that > derived data is okay to contribute to OSM. It is explicitly CC BY-SA 4.0. Does OSM have a problem with