barrier=hedge is what I would use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge
Shaun
On 17 Oct 2009, at 08:50, David ``Smith'' wrote:
Does anyone have a suggestion on mapping/tagging the lines of trees
that tend to be found along rural property lines?
Example:
Along with foot=yes if appropriate?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
barrier=hedge is what I would use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge
Shaun
On 17 Oct 2009, at 08:50, David ``Smith'' wrote:
Does anyone have a
When would that be appropriate? A link to a photo would be useful.
Shaun
On 17 Oct 2009, at 14:51, Anthony wrote:
Along with foot=yes if appropriate?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
barrier=hedge is what I would use.
When there's room to walk between the trees (and the barrier is only
a barrier to non-foot-traffic).
From the aerial, it's not clear whether or not that's the case.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
When would that be appropriate? A link to a photo
Um you would then have a highway=footway crossing the barrier. You can
_only_ route where there is a way. Barriers are not routable.
Shaun
On 17 Oct 2009, at 15:28, Anthony wrote:
When there's room to walk between the trees (and the barrier is only
a barrier to non-foot-traffic).
From the
According to the wiki, barriers are Not only impediments to a given
way, but also to free movements such as a walk (not following a
path) in the countryside.
barrier=hedge presumably implies foot=no, which is why I suggested
maybe adding foot=yes if this was not the case.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at
6 matches
Mail list logo
