[Talk-us] Unsigned routes (Re: shields and overlaps)

2011-06-04 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 6/4/2011 7:06 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote: Reminds me, we need to add some notation for unsigned routes in relations (the only approaches I can think of are either to tag it as roles on each member, with things like unsigned;west sometimes - which is icky but would work - or having separate

Re: [Talk-us] Unsigned routes (Re: shields and overlaps)

2011-06-04 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 6/5/2011 12:15 AM, nat...@nwacg.net wrote: In Arkansas, routes are not unsigned or (except in very rare cases) cosigned. The route ends where it meets a route of higher priority and begins again as a new segment elsewhere. There are a lot of states that do this internally. But most sign

Re: [Talk-us] Unsigned routes (Re: shields and overlaps)

2011-06-04 Thread Richard Welty
On 6/5/11 12:15 AM, nat...@nwacg.net wrote: In Arkansas, routes are not unsigned or (except in very rare cases) cosigned. The route ends where it meets a route of higher priority and begins again as a new segment elsewhere. Most Arkansas state highways and some US highways fall victim to this

Re: [Talk-us] Unsigned routes (Re: shields and overlaps)

2011-06-04 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 6/5/2011 12:22 AM, Richard Welty wrote: however, there are unsigned routes in NY; state maintained routes which have designations but which do not have signage, and some county routes. Three states - Florida, Alabama, and Tennessee - have an unsigned state designation for every segment of