stevea stevea...@softworkers.com writes:
However, the tag boundary=national_park is confused, as it is widely
overused, especially on STATE parks. Arguments are valid either way
whether to include or exclude it on State Parks. The reason appears
to be that boundary=national_park is
From the USFS data mentioned earlier, I noticed two oddities that did
not jibe with my understandings. #1, when there is an overlap of
boundaries between federal and state land, the two cannot be
coincident (i.e. EITHER National Forest OR State Park must be the
owner of the overlapped land).
SteveA,
I'm out of the country right now but can wait to get my hands on the data
when I get back.( Internet is spotty everywhere I've stayed. )
I've been working on US National Parks on the wiki, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_US_National_Parks. My goal
is to see all of the
A significant subset of the fresh data published on the
aforementioned US Forest Service (USFS) site (National Forest and
Wilderness boundaries, others are available) were successfully
transformed from NAD83/shapefile to WGS84/.osm. (Thanks to all who
made technical suggestions -- they
like this managed on OSM US tile servers?
Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
From: stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Wilderness Data
A significant
Done. Including all Los Padres National Forest wilderness boundaries
(of which there are ten).
I've also sent the suggester my ten steps for using the data source
he pointed me to. We've never met, but now OSM community is that
much stronger.
Now I'm finding additional correct wiki pages
6 matches
Mail list logo
